Disclaimer: This blog post solely reflects the opinion of the authors and should not be taken to represent the general views of IPPR’s management/ editorial team or those of fellow authors.
Populism claims it is “for the pure people” against the “corrupt elite” but is it really? Its rise across Europe recently exemplifies that it is not a force for good; from Britian’s UKIP to Orbán’s Fidesz, its discriminatory appeals can be harmful to certain groups and to the health of a democracy as a whole. It’s impact on Hungary has been great, with a rise in authoritarianism and populism, and a subsequent decline in democracy.
With this, populism is not “for the pure people” against the “corrupt elite;” instead, it is the elite against the people.
Most rises in populism have a direct link with economic insecurity, yet in some places like Hungary and Poland there is more than just economic factors at play. The elites have successfully managed to turn each individual against one another. Orbán’s use of religion by claiming Hungary is now a “Christian democracy,” despite initially claiming he was an atheist upon first election in 1998 is to ostracize certain groups. By doing this, Orbán was able to sustain his “anti- immigration policies” in the framework of a defense of the democracy he had created- with a Christian lens. This is just one tactic in which populist leaders can gain mass support for certain policies.
Beker looks further into polarizing forces in Hungary, in ‘The Rise of Right- Wing Populism.’ Fidesz has used tactics in the form of ‘cultural politics’ including mobilization of support in the form of demonstrations and protests. Blames on Communists, splits with Jews and ‘gypsies’ and appeals to Christianity have created cleavages. These are the cleavages formed by the elites to grasp upon- and maintain it. The media is also used as a weapon; with a “media war” against media outlets and journalists. Moreover, by 2017, around 90% of media outlets were owned by Orbán’s Fidesz party and its allies. As mentioned, the elites are those against the people- and these tactics are what have placed the elite against the people.
They have successfully polarized Hungary.
These Populist appeals have contributed to the maintenance of power by Orbán in Hungary. Through these appeals, his detrimental policies mobilize mass support. As mentioned, his anti- immigration policies have been supported through a Christian lens. Further, the polarization created by Fidesz has worked to “strengthen the ideological hegemony of right- nationalist- fascists settlement” within Hungary. As Scheppel explains, this is how “legalistic autocrats” maintain their hold on the country; through being elected via democracy and subsequently using that legitimacy to break down democracy and create an autocratic state. I believe this links to populism as the “charismatic leader” is able to appeal to the larger population.
The health of the economy contributes greatly to the extent to which populism appeals to certain people, especially because of how economic decline can crystalize “inequalities.” This in turn means individuals seek security from elsewhere, and succumb to the “charismatic leader” with their populist ideals and appeals to “the pure people,” especially on the right. Their emphasis on immigration and scapegoating tactics roots from economic insecurities. A specific example is that of Nigel Farage and his tactical appeals to “unfairness and loss,” migration, racism, amongst other things. He is an iconic populist figure within the UK with Brexit in the backdrop.
When considering Hungary, the economy took a toll with the global financial crisis. In 2007, real wages declined by 5%, unemployment increasing to 10% while inflation also rose significantly. In addition, as with many other countries, Hungary imposed austerity to limit spending, and the country was subject to loan schemes from both the IMF and the World Bank, creating a dependence. This was all under the MSZP party, which explains why the population succumbed to populist ideals- Orbán successfully gained power again in the 2010 election.
Yet, we know that the economy is just one factor. It has contributed significantly to the rise of populist parties across the European continent and the West as a whole. The relationship between financial insecurity and populist appeals is strong, but I find that it mainly creates an uncertainty on which populist, “charismatic” figures can feed upon. This relationship works in complex ways, but this is the trend we have seen with Farage and Orbán, as discussed. Beker also highlights that Austria and Italy’s populist movements are setting trends where other countries, specifically Hungary can follow. This can perhaps act as a warning to prevent populist forces from feeding on economic uncertainties.
But is populism always a negative force?
We see that populism can be interpreted as emerging naturally- overall, it is dissatisfaction with the current regime. In democratic terms, this means the ‘other’ view can be represented. However, we cannot deny that most of populism is the “radical right wing,” which can polarize the population as with Hungary. This right- wing populism is what uses the sentiment of “the pure people” which, as Wodak highlights is “a deeply authoritarian mindset.” Mouffe instead calls for “progressive populism” in which the mindset of “the people” against the elites can be erased; instead, there should be a “progressive answer” to their concerns and dissatisfaction. This would perhaps prevent populism from becoming a threatening force.
To conclude however, as it stands, it seems that populism is a force that the “corrupt elite” feed upon against “the pure people-” and not the other way around.
Beauchamp, Z. (2018). How Hungary’s Viktor Orbán destroyed democracy, and what it means for America. [online] Vox. Available at: https://www.vox.com/policy-andpolitics/2018/9/13/17823488/hungary-democracy-authoritarianism-trump [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Becker, J. (2010). The rise of right-wing populism in Hungary. SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, [online] 13(1), pp.29–40. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43293344 [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Gallaher, C. and Martin, G. (2020). Viktor Orbán’s use and misuse of religion serves as a warning to Western democracies. [online] The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/viktororbans-use-and-misuse-of-religion-serves-as-a-warning-to-western-democracies-146277 [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Gold, R. (n.d.). The economic causes of populism. [online] Global Solutions Initiative. Available at: https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GSJ5_Gold_Fetzer.pdf [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Henley, J. (2018). How populism swept through Europe over 20 years. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/nov/20/how-populism-emerged-as-electoralforce-in-europe [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Kaltwasser, C.R. (2012). Scholars should not just assume that populism is bad for democracy, but should instead concentrate on explaining populism’s positive and negative effects. [online] EUROPP. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2012/10/15/populism-and-liberal-democracy/ [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
LSE Blogs (2017). Five views: Is populism really a threat to democracy? [online] EUROPP. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/24/is-populism-really-a-threat-to-democracy/#Four [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Mickiewicz, T. (2020). What explains support for authoritarian populists in Hungary and Poland? [online] The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/what-explains-support-for-authoritarianpopulists-in-hungary-and-poland-151950 [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Molloy, D. (2018). What is populism, and what does the term actually mean? BBC News. [online] 6 Mar. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-43301423 [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Scheppele, K. (2018). Autocratic Legalism. [online] . Available at: https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/11%20Scheppele_SYMP_Online.pdf [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
Seymour, R. (2019). Opinion | Nigel Farage Is the Most Dangerous Man in Britain. The New York Times. [online] 28 May. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/28/opinion/nigel-farage-brexit.html [Accessed 16 Mar. 2021].
By Hellin Birbalta
Hellin Birbalta is a first year student studying Politics and International Relations at University College London. Her interests include writing about human rights, international conflict and violence, amongst other global issues.
You must log in to post a comment.